Saturday, July 19, 2014

Myntra, Flipkart, Snapdeal and all other online stores- Will you care to answer?

A motorcycle, heavy traffic, an enormous bag and scorching heat. The man keeps driving, trying to make his way between honking cars, half his attention on the bag hanging on one side of the bike. He had placed the heavy bag correctly on the rear seat and tightened both the straps as well before starting, but as usual, it had slipped to one side. He slows down to adjust the bag, but the bike wobbles. He tries to turn right, looks in the rear view mirror and sees his hanging bag, the traffic behind him makes him nervous. At night, his back aches, and recently, his left shoulder had been paining, possibly because the bag had been hanging to his preferred right side. He wants to look for a better job, but can not find one. He has to earn for his family, he can not give up just for his pain, while his family can not be sure he will be always safe on Indian roads.







No doubt we love to have our online orders delivered within 24 hours, but is it really worth risking someone's life? Yes, we are talking about the delivery man here who just delivered your trendy shoes, or maybe your new electronic gadget, someone whom you have never seen, and probably will never see again, carrying a mammoth bag, driving over 150kms a day on a motorcycle, jostling through busy traffic in scorching heat, often driving fast just to make sure YOU are not disappointed.

Yes, we all like everything to be delivered free, but should it be at the cost of a miserably low paid employee who has to face the extremely unsafe Indian roads everyday just because he has to make a living? Can the online stores be a little more sensitive and make sure that the bags are not huge, or make sure the delivery man does not travel more than 50 kms a day? Can they just fix some metal frame in which the bag can be placed safely? or can they at least compensate them well by charging Rs. 10-20 from the customer for every delivery? Do the delivery men have any accidental insurance sponsored by their company? A customer pays extra for faster delivery, does it ever reach the delivery boy? Is there any incentive for delivering orders before time? Are factors like heat and rain taken into account while distributing orders? Possibly, NO. Will Flipkart, Myntra, Snapdeal etc. WILL YOUR CARE TO ANSWER?


(Pictures have been taken randomly from the internet and though my camera too, hope Flipkart and Myntra do not target these people for getting clicked while working! )

Wednesday, February 19, 2014

The Good, Bad and Ugly of the 49-day government

The curtains are down for Delhi's most controversial yet active government. Politics in Delhi had never been so interesting for the last 15 years, and nobody actually cared what Shiela Dikshit was doing until the man with the the Jhaadu-weapon came and swept her away. But has the Kejriwal-led Government done justice to the Aam Aadmi of Delhi who voted AAP to power? Should the Aam Aadmi regret his vote, or is it an indication of a massive undercurrent in favor of AAP? Time to dissect the 49 days of chaotic governance.

1) Campaigning against VIP culture, ending it to a certain extent, and then falling into the trap of government facilities- a very simple mistake that could have been avoided had Kejriwal not been so anti-bungalows right from day 1. His justifications came very late. Instead, lies followed, and the last one was unearthed when an RTI revealed that it was Kejriwal who had asked for 5 BHK bungalows. Being a CM, it was the least he could have asked for considering the high-profile guests that would visit him, but the negativity around the houses made him a villain- the aam aadmi of Delhi compared his cramped 1 BHK with Kejriwal's twin 5 BHK's and the answer was clear, Kejriwal was no longer an Aam Aadmi.

2) Inexperience of the young cabinet hurt the AAP Government the most, be it Rakhi Birla or Somnath Bharti. Rakhi Birla, an ex-journalist, must have realized that it is always easier to be on the other side during an interview, for she really did not handle the media well when asked about her sudden switch from auto to the government paid car. And then followed the decision to procure new cars for Delhi ministers, a decision that only hampered their Aam Aadmi image.

3) No matter which government comes to power, the ones sleeping on footpaths really don't care, nor does the government work for their betterment. The reason is simple- they do not have voter IDs. But here was a government which was quick, proactive and adamant- they wanted night shelters for the homeless- other decisions could wait. If it is difficult to appreciate this effort, then maybe sleeping outside in the cold for one night is the answer for you.

4) One department which faced the wrath of Arvind Kejriwal was the Delhi Jal Board. Officials were transferred, suspended and made answerable. There were sting operations by news channels, the tanker mafia was being attacked by the volunteers of AAP itself, and the residents of Delhi were hopeful that the water supply might improve. But a mess that was created for decades can not be solved in 49 days Mr. Kejriwal. The hope has now crashed, yet again, and half of Delhi will again face irregular water supply, and the DJB officials will breathe free.

5) 20Kl of free water was announced for 3 months. The next government will not have the courage to stop this freebie, for freebies once announced are never revoked in India. Nobody knows how water was supposed to be free for 5 years and maybe the next government will never know how to supply free water. What has Delhi earned from it? A burden on its economy because the mess was never sorted.

6) Electricity rates were slashed by 50% for users with low consumption, again for 3 months. The Discoms are crying, bleeding and threatening to quit, but AAP has always maintained that there are irregularities in the profits of these companies. The residents of Delhi are dying with curiosity to know the logic behind all this, but again, nothing was revealed, and the aam aadmi of Delhi was busy preparing himself for 10 hour long power cuts.

7) The CAG audit of Discoms- a very uncommon move by any government since the Corporate-Government nexus has always flourished without any accountability in India. Every Delhiiite wanted to know how these agencies were making breathtaking profits, but did the 49-day government reveal anything substantial?

  • The CAG is advisory in nature and can only table its suggestions, and the law enforcement agencies need to act on these recommendations.
  • Assuming that the report reveals a lot of corruption in the power department, how can the citizen of Delhi be sure that action will be taken against these agencies? AAP is no longer in power and according to Mr. Kejriwal, the Congress and BJP will never act against Reliance. 
  • The report will never be discussed in the Delhi Assembly- it does not exist any longer. Who loses? The Aam Aadmi.
8) Mr. Sisodia remained very actively involved as the Home Minister and Education Minister of Delhi- maybe the short tenure of AAP was always in his mind. There were some surprise checks to act against missing teachers in schools and also check the quality of Mid-day meals. As a result, quick decisions followed. If every minister remains this active for 5 years, India might change completely before the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

9) Every school was given funds for repairs immediately. Again, a good move considering that Government Schools have terrible infrastructure and are never given funds for repairs. But Mr. Sisodia, who will monitor how these funds were used? 1 lakh, even though it will hardly make any difference, can not be used by our lethargic schools within 20 days. Again, no accountability for this money after the fall of the government.

10) Coming to Mr. Somnath- the media's favorite for he was always in the news for the wrong reasons.
  • Mr. Somnath was accused by the High Court for tampering with proofs, but AAP blatantly refused to accept it. The party, which had always demanded resignations from ministers without any investigation, was busy defending the same, even though it may have been right. But to the general public, AAP had backtracked on its own principles, yet again.
  • Danish Woman gets raped in Delhi, Mr. Somnath names her in the press conference. Journalist asks a tough question, Somnath calls him a Modi-paid journalist. Only if Somnath had been trained on how to deal with Indian Media, he could have avoided these goof-ups.
  • The Midnight Raid: While every media house accused AAP of moral policing, the Somnath Bharti led raid did make sense, for the citizens had already approached the police twice. The police ignored the complaints, nobody noticed, Somnath Bharti tried to help the people, and he became racist. The "we-do-not-have-search-warrants" was a lame excuse by the police to hide its inefficiency. Would they look for a search warrant if Dawood Ibrahim was executing a drug deal in Khirki Extension?

    Somnath never called the media, they reached on their own. The scenes of Somnath fighting with police officials were ugly, but did the media really show the reality? Only the residents of Khirki Extension could answer, and they answered by calling Somnath their 'Hero'. Was he racist? Maybe yes, according to the media.
11) Dharna All Night by Kejriwal- the biggest mistake. The Delhi Governmentt does not have any control over the Delhi Police. Shiela Dikshit recorded this message and played it every time something wrong happened in Delhi. But Mr. Kejriwal was in no mood to repeat these words. He did the unthinkable- dharna outside the home ministry.
  • Was Mr. Kejriwal out of legal options? Couldn't the Delhi Government openly debate this issue with the Home Ministry officials and look for options?
  • No way was the violence by AAP supporters justified.
  • Demanding suspension of a few officials was never a solution to Delhi's problems.
  • Instead of Dharna, a lot of other legal options could have been explored.
  • Asking supporters to stay away, and then calling them to join the Dharna was meant to cause chaos. Kejriwal was once again caught changing his statement.
  • Outcome of the Dharna? Police officials were sent on leave and by now, they must be back in the department.
The intention to fight it out with the Home Ministry was good, but Mr. Kejriwal, days of activism are over. A government fighting against another government will lead to unforeseen chaos in India, please respect this. Nobody would like to see Telangana activists sitting on Dharna outside the Home Ministry, and everybody will curse you for starting such a trend.

12) FIR against Shiela Dikshit and Anil Ambani, but will they ever be punished if found guilty? Just filing an FIR and running away after 49 days, is that the AAP way of investigating corruption cases? If Shiela Dikshit gets a clean chit from the next government after the investigation, AAP will have no right to protest, for it threw away the opportunity to show its zero-tolerance towards corrupt ministers.

13) Helpline for nursery admissions and a dedicated anti-corruption helpline- good initiatives if they keep continuing what they are meant for.

14) 5500 new permits to autos, thereby legalizing autos that were always present on the roads of Delhi but never had permits. Surely, the auto drivers will be relieved as they will not be harassed by the police and can operate freely in the NCR region. But what the move to make the autos accountable to the transport department instead of the Delhi Traffic Police could have been disastrous for the already frustrated citizens of Delhi, as the Delhi Traffic Police is the only force the auto drivers fear. 

15) Exempting bills of all those who participated in the 'Bijli-Satyagrah'. This can not be debated much because it was very clearly mentioned in their manifesto, even though such moves are extremely biased and should not be encouraged by any government.

16) SIT probe into the 1984 Sikh Riots- Is it something new? The Sikhs have seen a number of investigations, but was the intent ever there in any government to punish the culprits? I'm sure the Sikh community did see some hope in Arvind Kejriwal, but this has lasted only for 49 days. The report will definitely give a clean chit to all Congress leaders once again, but the Sikh community is now immune to such investigations, and AAP has only given one more to them.

17) While the AAP government has done 'exceptional' work considering the track record of all the governments in India, such quick decisions were expected from a party that is busy establishing its identity before the Lok Sabha elections. Some decisions were bold, but not even a single policy was implemented completely.

18) Removing FDI in retail was again a decision that will hit Delhi's economy in the long run, but as it was included in their policies, one can not complain about the decision. Also, the BJP is against FDI in retail, but has always called AAP 'Leftist'. It is strange that the same BJP has removed FDI in Rajasthan.

19) The Swaraj Bill was finalized, but never introduced. Nobody knows how Swaraj was to be implemented. How then can AAP spread the idea of Swaraj before testing it in anywhere in India? Delhi was the best place to start with, but sadly the opportunity has been lost.

20) The biggest expectation from AAP was in curbing crime against women. They had 49 days, but nobody remembers any major decision being taken to make Delhi safer for women. Setting up fast track courts is not a solution to stop the crimes, it can only facilitate the victim in getting speedy justice. A citizen's task force was planned, but it was never put into place officially. Citizen's task force can surely be a bigger threat to Delhi's girls considering its chances to become the "Moral police of Delhi". But on the whole, Delhi is still the same and AAP has lost the most important opportunity to win the hearts of Delhiites.

The police is not under the Delhi government, even Kumar Vishwas and Kejriwal were forced to repeat this.

21) Some of the best initiatives were seen in the Health Department. Satyendra Jain did some really good work by visiting hospitals regularly, making sure hospitals maintain sufficient stock of medicines. Also, 100 new Ambulances were planned for Delhi which already faces a very severe shortage of Ambulances. Only if the government had completed these new initiatives would the Health Department got a thumbs up from the citizens of Delhi, but again, everything remains on paper after 49 days.

New beds were added for the poor in hospitals.

22) Citizens action team for PDS, a much needed move to involve citizens in the correct distribution of food meant for the poor.

23) 10 crore allocated for Sports in Delhi, again a really good initiative.

24) Moving the Millennium Bus Depot away from the Yamuna- a mistake done by the Shiela Government which was always opposed by environmentalists. Though Shiela Dikshit said that Delhi does not have enough space for a new DTC bus depot, it seems very strange that new malls are cropping up every year in Delhi.

25) Simplifying the VAT structure was one of the main agendas of the AAP government and Arvind Kejriwal was quick to use his skills acquired during his tenure in the IT department- VAT was simplified and relief was provided to small scale businesses. Good or bad, only IT experts can give the implications of this move.

26) And finally the Jan Lokpal.

The JLP was the landmark bill that AAP had been banking upon, but going all out against the Central government and the Lieutenant Governer only exposed the wide gap between AAP and the 'Gaurdians of the Constitution'. There are a lot of conflicting terms in the constitution (Read here: ) according to which neither AAP nor the LG are wrong, but the way the bill was forced into the parliament only portrayed AAP as 'Anarchist' who were against the constitution. Kejriwal always knew that the bill would never be allowed by BJP and Congress and following to the constitutional procedure would take years to complete. Also, the Lok Sabha model code of conduct would be soon introduced and going to the Lok Sabha elections without the 'Jan Lokpal Bill' would only cause embarrassment to them and therefore the only move available was to press the 'Self Destroy' button and become a martyr- the first of its kind which wanted to show that it is not hungry for power- only to fight the Lok Sabha elections to get the highest level of power.

During the 49 days, though the Kejriwal-led AAP government started some really good initiatives and took very important decisions quickly, the fact that none of them reached a final conclusion may not go in its favor. The intention was there to bring about quick change in Delhi, but the Mamta Banerjee style of dharna is just not the way a government should work. They are not leftist, nor against capitalism, but yes they are not totally away from the two.
AAP has lost a very important opportunity by becoming a martyr of its leader's statements, but surely, there are a lot of positives as well.

Saturday, January 11, 2014

AAP should not fight the Lok Sabha elections without making it's objectives and goals clear

A debate has been going on whether AAP should fight the Lok Sabha elections or not. While there are equally strong points to support both the sides, I somehow feel that AAP should not ‘rush’ into fighting these elections. Here is why:

1) Throwing the Congress out-
UPA-II has ruined India during the last 5 years. The boom that could be seen 7-10 years ago now seems like a bubble which was bound to burst. No one can argue that these elections are more about humiliating UPA so that they are never able to recover from this defeat. The presence of AAP will only give Congress a chance to survive this much required blow.

2) While I always believed that AAP was not a ‘vote-cutting’ party in Delhi, the Lok Sabha is going to be a very different story. The number of voters in every constituency is very high, and winning a constituency requires widespread influence, especially at the grassroot level. We already have a number of parties ‘cutting ‘votes, AAP will only facilitate such MPs to retain their seats.

3) Economic Policies-Yogender Yadav has long been mentioning the 31 committees that are working to formulate AAP’s national policies. But what worries me the most is the economic policies of AAP-
  • Prashant Bhushan has recently been very friendly with Marxist and Communist leaders, often sharing his views with them and getting appreciated. While AAP claims that it is neither Left nor Right, their inclination towards the Left is a cause of worry for the nation which is already reeling under high fiscal deficit and slow Industrial Growth.
  • Though Kejriwal very clearly talks against freebies in his book 'Swaraj', free water is clearly one. Such expectations will be there if they fight the Lok Sabha elections. Not all states can afford free water and cheap electricity and subsidizing such basic necessities will put tremendous stress on our Current Account Deficit. Explaining these terms to a person in a village is not possible and AAP will have to realize it sooner or later that elections are not about announcing freebies alone.
  • The socialist outlook of Mr. Yogender Yadav is also a cause of concern. We have already seen the outcome of the socialist policies of Nehru. It is very important for AAP to make it clear whether they will support the socialist policies or come out with some out of the box ideas. Until then, AAP should be seen as a burden to the already fragile and suffering economy.
  • In Delhi, AAP has been focusing on corruption and cracking down on the inefficient bureaucrats. But what I fear might be neglected is the industrial growth and the revenue generation if no strong policies are made to encourage small businesses and young entrepreneurs, something that Kejriwal initially supported but hasn’t spoken about lately.
  • The economic policies and initiatives of BJP have been good and the fact that BJP governed states have actually shown strong growth even during the slowdown of the Indian economy does make one think that AAP may not be able to compete with BJP’s economic vision.
  • Opposing FDI throughout India is again a policy that will affect the economy. While opening ourselves completely might put our small home grown business at risk, the revenue and the employment generation does make up for the losses. So opening ourselves to restricted FDI in some of the industries can be a good move, but blindly opposing it will only cause the investors to be wary of investing in India. 
4) Fragmented Parliament and risks of coalition-
Parties like BSP, SP, CPI(M) etc. have always focused on opposing policies that affect their vote bank. How many times have we seen the coalition partners of UPA changing during the last 10 years? Almost every year someone withdraws support or rejoins. What did we get in the end? A 2G scam by a regional party DMK! Every party wants a good portfolio to siphon out money (like all Bihar leaders want railways!) All this is ONLY because of the arm-twisting that goes on for 5 years in the name of support. Major policies are opposed mindlessly and the populist policies are supported by everyone.

AAP by winning anywhere close to 30-50 seats could again fragment the parliament further and what we will surely see is more arm-twisting, this time by AAP. Let one party come close to majority for once, because anyway even coalition governments are difficult to bring down in less than 5 years.

5) Finding clean candidates is easy, but tracking their honesty is not!
While finding good candidates out of a billion people is not difficult, but let’s not forget that we have only 3 months to look for such honest people. Can the leaders of AAP screen and judge so many candidates and be sure that the ones they choose will not work for personal gains? Managing Delhi was easy, and will be easy in the future as well since it geographically fits in a very small area. But managing candidates at an all-India level is just not possible without a well-defined process, something that is missing from AAP’s structure.

6) Resources and availability of leaders-
If one has analyzed why AAP was able to win Delhi was because of the convenient size of Delhi. Not much effort was required to travel from one constituency to another and AAP was able to manage with just 5-10 leaders. Jan-sabhas got good response since they were right in the neighborhood of the people. But is it possible to hold jan-sabhas in huge constituencies? Some of the constituencies may not have dense population, but could be half the size of Delhi! How will then AAP manage its resources and make its leaders available for jan-sabhas? And I’m sure, jan-sabhas will be replaced by rallies, like the Jan-Vishwas Rally in Amethi.

7) Swaraj- yet to be tested and risky!
While no one can argue that the concept of Swaraj is really attractive, but such changes cannot be incorporated overnight. What Arvind tried by holding his ‘Janta Darbar’ was actually a very predictable failure considering that no process had been defined to involve people and refine the frivolous complainants! Without seeing the practical implementation of Swaraj (and Delhi is the best place to show it), it is just a risky concept which may give power to people to fight against each other for resources.

8) National Policies- Referendums and the risks involved
Yes, it is now time to talk about Prashant Bhushan and his views that have caused an uproar everywhere. While there is no doubt that his intention is to make the life of Kashmiris better, holding a referendum for such issues could be disastrous. What may be successful in one state could mean expectations and hostilities in another, for example the North Eastern states. What if Kashmiris vote against army presence and the rest of India votes in favor of it? Whose referendum our we going to accept? Politics needs maturity, and though they are maturing fast enough, we cannot afford to put issues of national integration at stake by giving power in the hands of people who are yet to prove their worth politically.

9) Reservations and Mr. Yadav’s recent views
The word that has ruined India and divided us on the basis of our caste- the R-word. While Kejriwal’s views on reservations are impressive and give us some hope of seeing a revamped social structure, they will not be accepted by the people who are used to reservations. There will be stiff resistance and violent protests if the scope of reservations is decreased. But at the same time, Mr. Yadav supports including more communities in this framework. There are already many communities trying to get reservations and there are a number of political parties supporting them. How then is AAP different from others? We just can NOT afford to have any more parties which support reservations. Hope AAP will make its stand clear in the coming days and impress everyone, till then I would personally refrain from supporting AAP.

10) Religion and AAP’s inexperience
The major mistakes of AAP have been while handling religion, even though Delhi is one of the easiest states to handle because of its tolerance for different religions and communities. But going national will mean having a very very sensitive approach towards religion and being secular- not like the BJP or Congress. Can AAP do it? Looking at the age and experience of its members, it seems very improbable. The media will hound the members of AAP to death, and any comment that fuels hatred will be repeatedly shown to gain TRPs. And considering that AAP has only 3 months to mature, it really is a difficult task.

11) Inexperience and immaturity
What makes me discuss inexperience? Because the actions of AAP after coming to power in Delhi have shown its inexperience. Mr. Vishwas has started talking more than before- challenging Modi was one thing he should have avoided right now. Prashant Bhushan has made very dangerous statements. Kejriwal and his young cabinet have been struggling to face the media, specially Rakhi Birla who has been rude at times. The Janta Darbar itself was a clear display of inexperience. Anyone could have predicted the chaos that one would witness without any defined process. Even Mr. Sisodia wants people to volunteer and monitor the government schools. But again, is it feasible without a well defined process?

I do agree that contesting on all seats is important for people to take AAP seriously. I would love to see AAP sitting in the opposition by cleaning up parties like SP, BSP and reducing Congress to a regional party. But by focusing on the downfall of BJP, AAP will surely put India’s next 5 years at risk- political instability, policy failures and economic downfall might follow if AAP hurts BJP more than the regional parties.

It is therefore important to focus on Congress ruled states and some others states that are ruled by regional parties like UP, Bihar, Jharkhand, Tamil Nadu and. It will be great if AAP leaders fight against incumbent leaders like Rahul Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi, Digvijay Singh, Kapil Sibal, Rajnath Singh, Nitin Gadkari and throw these people out. We all know AAP is the only party that has the potential to do so.

It is important to set examples of honesty and clean politics, but not at the cost of India’s development.

After all, it is the Aam Aadmi who will bear the brunt of his/her wrong decisions for the next 5 years.